{"id":118,"date":"2022-02-28T16:04:57","date_gmt":"2022-02-28T16:04:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/chapter\/chapter-21-data-collection-and-strategies-for-oer-programs\/"},"modified":"2022-05-19T20:07:20","modified_gmt":"2022-05-19T20:07:20","slug":"chapter-21-data-collection-and-strategies-for-oer-programs","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/chapter\/chapter-21-data-collection-and-strategies-for-oer-programs\/","title":{"raw":"Data Collection and Strategies for OER Programs","rendered":"Data Collection and Strategies for OER Programs"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"chapter-21:-data-collection-and-strategies-for-oer-programs\">\n<h2>Why Collect Data?<\/h2>\nWhen running an OER program, time can often be scarce, and a program manager may wonder why data collection needs to occupy a significant portion of this always-limited resource. Besides extrinsic motivators such as a demand for data in a report to stakeholders, data is also the peripheral nervous system of your program\u2019s organization; it is the way a program can assess successes, failures, emergent ideas, and urgent issues to address.\n<h3>How Can Data Help?<\/h3>\nData collection, analysis, and reporting can yield multiple benefits for your OER program. Data can guide strategic decision-making when a program wants to adjust, adapt, and move forward. A report based on collected and analyzed data can help tell the story of why your program has the potential to, or already is, making a difference in your institution or system. Data can also indicate a need for targeted open education programming and funding, such as data on high textbook costs, students\u2019 financial needs, or faculty awareness of OER.\n<h2>Data Collection and Ethics<\/h2>\nBefore collecting data, be sure to keep some basic ethical guidelines in mind:\n<h3>Privacy<\/h3>\nData privacy may be a priority at your institution already, given the potential for cybercrime and the existence of legal requirements for data privacy, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States. Alongside these, be sure that you have a reason to collect and\/or report any personal identifiable information (PII) before doing so. For example, if an awarded grant proposal requires an institutional email address (which is likely already displayed on their campus website), this is likely enough contact information; including a phone number or a physical address may not be necessary.\n<h3>Consent<\/h3>\nAnyone who is submitting data to you, or getting data collected passively via web or platform analytics, should know who this data will be submitted to and why it\u2019s being collected. When someone has informed consent in submitting data to you, not only do they acknowledge that their data is being collected, but they know your intent in collecting and using this data. Transparency in your data needs pre-collection and your reporting post-collection will help.\n<h3>Anonymity<\/h3>\nAlongside data privacy, be sure to anonymize, or \u201cde-identify,\u201d the data you collect whenever necessary. For example, in the United States, institutions often meet FERPA guidelines in collecting student data by replacing PII with an anonymized identifier with no meaning to anyone except the data collectors and analyzers (OECD 2016).\n<h3>Equity<\/h3>\nEquity is often an implicit goal in OER programs; any program that attempts to close the gap in educational materials costs and barriers to access is essentially addressing educational equity (DOERS3 2021). Therefore, be sure to collect, analyze, and report your data through the lens of educational equity; if you can analyze how the implementation of OER affects marginalized demographic groups at your institution, that analysis will help your initiative tell a more focused and comprehensive story of how your program works. See the Disaggregating Your Data section later in the chapter for more details.\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">Data Collection and Institutional Review Boards (IRB)<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nInstitutional Review Boards are essential for ensuring that research taking place complies with both legal and institutional guidelines. In the United States, institutional review boards are built into federal regulations and ensure protections for all human research subjects. In the United States regulations, educational research on the effectiveness of instructional strategies, curriculum changes, and classroom management methods are typically exempt, so long as the research does not impact students\u2019 ability to learn and instructors\u2019 ability to teach (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018).\n\nSurveys, interviews, and focus groups can be exempt, but the more easily identifiable the subjects are on a personal level, the more likely that this research will not be exempt. Keeping privacy, consent, and anonymity in mind will help with this, as will awareness and transparency of any third parties that may be responsible for the collection and\/or protection of your data.\n\nThis will likely cover most open education research, but it is still good to do due diligence with your IRB; there may be an outstanding issue with a particular study or further institutional guidelines which need to be met. Once you have a plan for a research study or a large data collection effort, contact your IRB for your institution\u2019s own details and guidelines.\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>An OER Data Workflow, From Strategy to Collection<\/h2>\nWhen you are starting your OER program\u2019s data collection, don\u2019t start at the collecting part: instead, start with figuring out exactly why you need data and how you\u2019ll use it once it\u2019s collected. Then, move to the <em>what<\/em> with actual data collection. To model this process, this chapter will work in chronological order and discuss data collection at the <em>end<\/em> of the chapter. You may encounter some data-specific terminology in the examples that you\u2019re unsure of at first, and this is okay; data terminology is discussed in the Data Collection section at the end.\n<h3>Step 1: Creating a Critical Questions List<\/h3>\nBecause the needs of your stakeholders should drive your decision-making in an OER program, start with these needs when determining what type of data you want to collect. You can do this by looking at each stakeholder group for the program and determining a list of critical questions that your key stakeholders will ask, therefore determining a need to collect the necessary data to answer these questions (see Step 3).\n\nPlease note that you first need to <em>know<\/em> your stakeholders and their environments. See <a href=\"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/chapter\/chapter-8-building-familiarity-on-campus\/\">Chapter 8, Building Familiarity on Campus<\/a>, for ways to familiarize yourself with the needs of diverse stakeholders at your institution. This familiarity will also help you know how to obtain data from different departments or offices at your institution, and possibly how easy or difficult that process will be.\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Executive Administration<\/h4>\n<ul>\n \t<li>How much in textbook cost avoidance have you saved students over the past academic year?<\/li>\n \t<li>How many students has this program affected?<\/li>\n \t<li>What are the savings numbers for last semester?<\/li>\n \t<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student retention at a course level? A degree program level?<\/li>\n \t<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this effect larger for first-generation students?<\/li>\n \t<li>How long should we expect savings to continue due to one award? Do faculty turn to commercial resources after a certain period of time? Why do they, if so?<\/li>\n \t<li>How do faculty feel about OER? Does that differ by department or if they\u2019re teaching introductory \/ advanced courses?<\/li>\n \t<li>Do students think that the cost of materials is an important thing for our institution to address?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Instructional Faculty (Instructors, Instructional Designers)<\/h4>\n<ul>\n \t<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this a same-instructor comparison, or an aggregate of all instructors?<\/li>\n \t<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success in the College of Arts and Sciences?<\/li>\n \t<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success in our IT degree programs?<\/li>\n \t<li>For all the OER used in the Biology department, which textbook is used most for Concepts of Biology?<\/li>\n \t<li>How do students feel about the OER materials they\u2019ve used?<\/li>\n \t<li>Do enough of us know about OER to get started with implementation? How do faculty feel about OER once they get to know it?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Students and Student Government Associations<\/h4>\n<ul>\n \t<li>We are looking to support the implementation of OER campus-wide. Which faculty already are adopting OER?<\/li>\n \t<li>If all of our World History I sections had no-cost OER instead of commercial textbooks, how much would this save students over the next academic year?<\/li>\n \t<li>Is a student who takes an OER course in Electrical Engineering at our technical college more or less likely to be hired directly after graduation?<\/li>\n \t<li>What\u2019s keeping our faculty from adopting OER? How can we help with any barriers they\u2019re facing?<\/li>\n \t<li>How do students feel about OER once they\u2019ve used it?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Campus Stores<\/h4>\n<ul>\n \t<li>What percentage of students on campus are interested in a print-on-demand program for OER?<\/li>\n \t<li>Do bookstore employees know about OER? What do they think about it?<\/li>\n \t<li>What do students think about our new low-cost mathematics platform?<\/li>\n \t<li>How are students performing due to our new low-cost psychology adaptive platform?<\/li>\n \t<li>If we do a print service for open textbooks, what percentage of students in the course would want a printed textbook?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Step 2: Exploring Data Types<\/h3>\nOnce you have a comprehensive list of critical questions, turn these lists into tables with a column for the data you need to collect. The table can set the standards for how and when you collect various data for each project within your OER program, along with partnerships that need to be made to gather data outside of your direct access and\/or control.\n\nBecause data collection may be a new practice to a first-time OER program manager, we will first discuss some basic data methodologies and ways to gather useful, analyzable OER-related data at your institution or system.\n<h4>Quantitative Methods: Getting Impactful Numerical Data<\/h4>\nQuantitative methods of data collection result in data that can be represented by and condensed into numbers (Blackstone 2012). Quantitative data may have a reputation for being a less human way of looking at a program, as it\u2019s often seen as the \u201chard\u201d or \u201cobjective\u201d kind used exclusively on impact or accountability reports. This isn\u2019t the whole story for OER program managers; quantitative data can find the magnitude of the effect of particular OER programs or projects, the most pressing needs of an institution or a department when selecting course materials, or how different introductory courses at your institution have adopted OER at different rates.\n\nOER programs are, by default, focused on educational equity, and these programs can be sidetracked by the perceived \u201cobjectivity\u201d of quantitative data. All quantitative data, including OER program data, will have its flaws, and too much reliance on quantitative data may steer a program into the illusion of pure objectivity (Armor 1998). Be sure to take into account how power, privilege, and inequity could interact and intersect with your data and how you analyze it. Qualitative data can also help with this, as discussed in the next section.\n<h5>Quantitative Surveying<\/h5>\nA form with answers which can be quantified is sent to instructors, staff, and\/or students. Quantitative response formats include numerical responses, multiple choice responses, rating scales, and rankings.\n\nExamples of quantitative survey data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Percentage of higher education faculty who are aware of OER (Seaman 2018, p.11)\n<ul>\n \t<li>Keep in mind: How aware is \u201caware\u201d when it\u2019s self-reported? Are you asking this question and defining terminology first? Do faculty know that awareness goes beyond knowing these definitions?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n \t<li>Ranking of the most serious barriers to adopting OER (Seaman 2017, p.30)\n<ul>\n \t<li>Keep in mind: If you have a \u201cquality\u201d item ranked in here, how do faculty define what quality is? Open-ended qualitative responses will help here.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>Web Analytics<\/h5>\nIf you have a website for your initiative that offers impactful opportunities like professional development, grant applications, or OER discovery assistance, analytics can help you understand where your stakeholders are visiting, what they are prioritizing, and how long they are spending on the site. Analytics may also be available from third-parties in your web-based OER repositories and textbook platforms. Be sure to take privacy into account when addressing analytics: are you (or third-parties) over-collecting what you need?\n\nExamples of web analytics data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Number of unique users visiting a web page per time period (day, week, month, etc.)\n<ul>\n \t<li>Keep in mind: These are often anonymized, but they\u2019re based on unique internet protocol (IP) addresses. Are these IP addresses deleted, or are they stored somewhere? This could be personal identifiable information (PII) that would need to be protected.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n \t<li>Top regions\/countries with OER downloads or views in a repository\n<ul>\n \t<li>Keep in mind: Are these places more likely to use your OER because they have English as a first or second language? What would happen if you offered translations?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n \t<li>Most-downloaded open resources in a repository\n<ul>\n \t<li>Keep in mind: This may be because of one gigantic supersection adoption, or it may be many individuals downloading a particular resource from all walks of life. It\u2019s possible that due to protecting PII, you may never know the difference. An adoption survey can help, but it\u2019s tough to get a high response rate on those surveys<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>No-Cost and Low-Cost Designators in Course Schedules<\/h5>\nOER program managers have been considering the implementation of no-cost and low-cost course materials designators in student registration systems since 2013, when Maricopa Community College\u2019s Maricopa Millions program implemented its OER designator and shared this practice with the larger community (Maricopa Community College 2013). Multiple states have now mandated no-cost, low-cost, and\/or OER designators, and both individual institutions and university systems have moved these programs forward in recent years (SPARC 2021). There are many factors to keep in mind when using designator data: see the Further Reading section in this chapter for a comprehensive resource on designators to assist with this.\n\nExamples of no-cost and low-cost course materials designator data include:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Percentage of sections with no-cost course materials designators in a course<\/li>\n \t<li>Number of student course enrollments affected by no-cost and low-cost course materials designators<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Qualitative Methods: Getting Meaningful Perspectives and Experiences<\/h4>\nQualitative data has a reputation for being the \u201csoft\u201d or subjective data that, at first glance, may appear to not be as helpful in determining the impact of your program or informing future decisions. As an OER program manager, it\u2019s a great idea to throw this reputation out entirely: qualitative data collection is extremely helpful in illustrating the meaning behind quantitative data, understanding the overall emotions and opinions surrounding various goals and projects within your program, and identifying emerging trends which your more deterministic quantitative questions could not have anticipated.\n\nQualitative data can be intimidating, as extra time and skills are required to manage and analyze open-ended qualitative data. Still, the outcomes of this extra time and effort can impact the quality and sustainability of your program heavily, and getting to know qualitative data is highly recommended.\n<h5>Qualitative Surveying<\/h5>\nOften within the same form as quantitative questions, qualitative survey questions demand answers which can be categorized and interpreted at a semantic level. Qualitative responses in surveys are typically open-ended short responses and open-ended paragraph\/essay responses, along with the \u201cOther\u201d text box option for quantitative multiple-choice questions.\n\nExamples of qualitative survey data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Quotes which are illustrative of corresponding quantitative OER findings (Bell 2018, p.14)<\/li>\n \t<li>Emerging trends and issues in OER which quantitative survey questions did not anticipate (Gallant 2018, p.25)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>Interviews and Focus Groups<\/h5>\nInterviews and focus groups are in-depth, largely qualitative data collection methods which normally involve a conversation with someone, or a group of people, in order to dive deeper into a particular topic than quantitative research can usually cover (Bhattacherjee 2012). One salient benefit of these methods is that trends and potential issues often emerge naturally from these conversations.\n\nUnlike surveys, interviewing and running focus groups require building a rapport with participants, listening actively, handling emotions during conversations, and managing issues of inclusion, such as the hidden cultural and power dimensions of a conversation (McGrath 2018). Having more than one researcher working on the project can help keep interview and focus group analyses from skewing in the direction of one researcher\u2019s line of thinking. Focus groups may also include more methodical activities to start a focused conversation, such as card sorting for usability and user experience topics (Babich 2019).\n\nAs one person or group cannot reliably represent an entire group of people, more than one interview or focus group is often planned when gathering data about the efficacy of an OER program. Examples of interview data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Emergent ideas from students on the usability of an OER text or platform (Cooney 2017, p.169)<\/li>\n \t<li>Emergent issues regarding registration deadlines and faculty textbook adoptions from groups of students (Freed, Friedman, Lawlis, and Stanton 2018)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">OER Data Examples<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nThe following table includes some examples of key impact indicators, data kept for analysis and calculations, data that disaggregates other data into various groups, methods used by grantees or overall instructional faculty, and perceptions of various course material-related topics by overall instructional faculty. Please feel free to add to, remove, or revise this data list for your own program\u2019s needs and contexts.\n\n<a class=\"rId5\" href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/spreadsheets\/d\/1ApnAYD2LlcnOFGn-3Fsd1YGNoByVdRDk11LAGgBkDDI\/edit\">OER Data List Spreadsheet<\/a>\n\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">Disaggregating Your Data to Address Equity Directly<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n\nA focus on equal, day-one, no-cost access to resources is inherently a focus on equity; equity should be within an OER program manager\u2019s mode of thinking at all times, and therefore measures focusing on equity should be integral to every OER program\u2019s overall goals and strategies. When addressing student success with OER, measuring only the total aggregate data for all students can be a quick way to gauge overall effectiveness, but it is not a way to find out if equal access to quality resources is leading to more success specifically for students with barriers to that access. In fact, only looking at the data of all students affected by an OER course transformation will likely lead to an analysis that isn\u2019t measuring your intended equity-focused outcomes (Grimaldi, Mallick, and Waters 2019).\n\nTo bring equity into your data collection strategy, plan to collect disaggregated data (data categorized by various groups) from your institution which reflects various equity groups being addressed primarily in an equity-focused program: those with barriers to educational materials access and those for whom traditional materials tend to exclude. Examples of disaggregated-data studies on OER efficacy include a same-instructor, multi-year analysis which breaks down efficacy results by Pell eligibility, race\/ethnicity, and enrollment status, which found disproportionate effects for marginalized groups (Colvard, Watson, and Park 2018) and a two-semester study of a calculus course with and without OER in 2014, which found no effect for all students but positive effects for marginalized groups (Delgado, Delgado, and Hilton 2019)\n<ul>\n \t<li>Demographic groups that should be considered in OER data disaggregation include but are not limited to (DOERS 2021):<\/li>\n \t<li>Socioeconomic status of the student or student\u2019s family (Pell Grant eligibility)<\/li>\n \t<li>Race\/ethnicity of the student<\/li>\n \t<li>Gender of the student, including self-reported gender identities<\/li>\n \t<li>Indigenous status, if applicable in your region<\/li>\n \t<li>First-generation status<\/li>\n \t<li>Enrollment status and teaching\/learning modalities (part-time, full-time \/ in-person, online, hybrid)<\/li>\n \t<li>Accessibility needs \/ students with varied abilities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3>Step 3: Assigning Specific Data Collection to Your Critical Questions<\/h3>\nNow that you have your critical questions from stakeholders across your institution and a working knowledge of the fundamentals of OER data collection, it\u2019s time to plan your actions. By assigning the types of data required by your stakeholders to answer their questions, you\u2019ll have a framework for exactly what you need to collect, along with the stakeholders for which the reports on this data will be intended.\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 262px;width: 100%\"><caption>Table 21.1. Stakeholder Example: Executive Administration<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 15px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 15px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How much in textbook cost avoidance have you saved students over the past academic year?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Student OER\/zero-cost section enrollments affected this academic year, cost savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 15px\">How many students has this program affected?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 15px\">Section enrollments affected cumulatively at the semester level<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">What are the savings numbers for last semester?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Section enrollments affected at the semester level, cost savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student retention at a course level? A degree program level?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Institution\u2019s preferred method of measuring student retention per each OER section, e.g. Drop\/Fail\/Withdraw or D\/F\/Withdraw (DFW) rates<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this effect larger for first-generation students?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per student affected, disaggregation of data by demographic groups<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How long should we expect savings to continue due to one award? Do faculty turn to commercial resources after a certain period of time? Why do they, if so?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Checks on sustainability of an OER implementation for each instructor and each course\/section, survey responses if OER use is discontinued<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How do faculty feel about OER? Does that differ by department or if they\u2019re teaching introductory \/ advanced courses?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with instructional faculty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Do students think that the cost of materials is an important thing for our institution to address?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 185px;width: 100%\"><caption>Table 21.2. Stakeholder Example: Instructional Faculty (Instructors, Instructional Designers)<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 449.383px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 531.75px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this a same-instructor comparison, or an aggregate of all instructors?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">Grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section, disaggregation of data by instructor of course before and after OER implementation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success in the College of Arts and Sciences?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per college, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success in our IT degree programs?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per degree program, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">For all the OER used in the Biology department, which textbook is used most for Concepts of Biology?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per department, open textbook(s) or other OER adopted per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 449.383px\">How do students feel about the OER materials they\u2019ve used?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 531.75px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Do enough of us know about OER to get started with implementation? How do faculty feel about OER once they get to know it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">Qualitative and quantitative data on the participation in \/ impact of professional development programming on OER at the institution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"width: 100%\"><caption>Table 21.3. Stakeholder Example: Students and Student Government Associations<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"width: 448.047px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 525.078px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">We are looking to support the implementation of OER campus-wide. Which faculty already are adopting OER?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Instructional faculty in each OER section, colleges\/departments\/degree programs per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">If all of our World History I sections had no-cost OER instead of commercial textbooks, how much would this save students over the next academic year?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Annual OER projections, projected number of enrollments in next AY, average savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">Is a student who takes an OER course in Electrical Engineering at our technical college more or less likely to be hired directly after graduation?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">OER section enrollment per student per degree program, hiring data per student<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">What\u2019s keeping our faculty from adopting OER? How can we help with any barriers they\u2019re facing?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with instructional faculty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">How do students feel about OER once they\u2019ve used it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Course evaluations, surveys<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 154px;width: 100%\"><caption>Table 21.4. Stakeholder Example: Campus Stores<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.078px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.047px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 465.578px\">What percentage of students on campus are interested in a print-on-demand program for OER?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.578px\">Do bookstore employees know about OER? What do they think about it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.578px\">What do students think about our new low-cost mathematics platform?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 465.578px\">How are students performing due to our new low-cost psychology adaptive platform?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 515.547px\">Platforms adopted per section, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section, same-instructor comparisons before and after<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 47px\">\n<td style=\"height: 47px;width: 465.578px\">If we do a print service for open textbooks, what\u2019s the average percentage of students in the course who would want a printed textbook?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 47px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Step 4: Creating a Place for Your Data Collection<\/h3>\nNow that you have identified which data you need to collect based on stakeholder needs, categorized and defined each type of data, and determined the methods for data collection for each, it\u2019s time to create one place where all of this data resides. Whenever possible, keep this data together in one file; questions will inevitably arise which will require you to bring data points together that may have seemed entirely disconnected at first.\n\nThere is no one correct method or platform to host your data. When considering where this place for your data will reside, consider the following:\n<ul>\n \t<li>Which methods are you most familiar with?<\/li>\n \t<li>Which methods allow you to sort by any data point easily?<\/li>\n \t<li>Which methods allow a quick search of your data?<\/li>\n \t<li>Which methods can manage multiple years of data? Does the system get overloaded when you have too many columns or rows?<\/li>\n \t<li>Will you keep any data considered personally identifiable information? In this case, which methods allow for you to comply with all FERPA guidelines and manage personal data ethically? What should you <em>not <\/em>share with the public due to privacy?<\/li>\n \t<li>If some data needs to be protected (e.g. in the event of gathering PII), how secure are the methods and platforms from cyberattacks?<\/li>\n \t<li>Which methods allow for accessible data visualization? This will allow you to make your data more usable and readable to stakeholders.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nHere are a few examples of places for OER data. All of these examples have internal data storage tools that are linked directly to their external reporting structures:\n<ul>\n \t<li><a class=\"rId6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data\">Affordable Learning Georgia<\/a> uses Microsoft Excel for one large ALG Tracking sheet. This sheet is hosted in a shared drive and able to be edited by anyone in ALG. Microsoft Power BI links with Excel to create data visualizations and export to PDF for institution-specific reports.<\/li>\n \t<li><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc\">Kwantlen Polytechnic University<\/a> visualizes their live Zero Textbook Cost program data through Tableau.<\/li>\n \t<li><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/\">Open Oregon Educational Resources<\/a> stores their data in a Google Sheet and visualizes this data in a searchable web table.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nBy this point in the planning process, you should have a solid data strategy and plan in place for your OER program. This plan should evolve over time as stakeholder needs and data platform capabilities change and\/or expand.\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\nData collection allows an OER program manager to analyze program activities, determine the impact of projects, and report on this impact to governments, executive administrators, faculty and staff, students, and the public. Determining how you will measure the impact of your OER program early in the building process is a crucial part of creating and sustaining a successful program. Be sure to refer to your Environmental Scan (see Building Familiarity on Campus) in determining who, other than you and your team, collects and shares this helpful data.\n<h2>Recommended Resources<\/h2>\n<a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/\">Marking Open and Affordable Courses<\/a> (Hare, Kirschner, and Reed 2020), an open text published by the University of Texas at Arlington, is a comprehensive guide to no-cost and low-cost designators, containing analyses of the policy and practices behind OER\/affordable course markings and nine case studies from diverse higher education institutions and systems.\n\nGetting to know the basics of quantitative and qualitative research is an essential task for new OER program managers. <a class=\"rId10\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/\">Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices<\/a> (Bhattacherjee 2012) is an open textbook that dives into the theories behind both quantitative and qualitative research; be sure to check out the full chapter on qualitative analysis (p.113).\n\nThis text only addresses the collection of data as immediately relevant to OER Program Managers. For a more in-depth look at OER research methods (for example, as meant to be published within a peer-reviewed journal), please read the <a class=\"rId11\" href=\"http:\/\/openedgroup.org\/toolkit\">OER Research Toolkit <\/a>(Open Education Group 2016).\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\"><header class=\"textbox__header\">Key Takeaways<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ol>\n \t<li>Use quantitative data to find the magnitude of the effect of particular OER programs or projects, the needs of your institution and its departments when selecting course materials, or how different introductory courses at your institution have adopted OER at different rates.<\/li>\n \t<li>Use qualitative data to illustrate the meaning behind quantitative data, gain an understanding of the overall emotions and opinions surrounding various goals and projects within your program, and identify emerging trends which your more deterministic quantitative questions could not have anticipated.<\/li>\n \t<li>OER programs are inherently focused on equity. Planning on collecting disaggregated data by groups with barriers to quality educational resource access will help measure the effect your program has on the students who need it most.<\/li>\n \t<li>Reporting data will be largely based on what your key stakeholders want to know. Use information from your environmental scan to further plan the data you will collect.<\/li>\n \t<li>Stakeholder needs and the capabilities of platforms to keep and analyze data will change over time at your institution. Be sure that your plan evolves alongside these changes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Armor, David Alain. 1998. \u201cThe illusion of objectivity: A bias in the perception of freedom from bias.\u201d <em>Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering<\/em>, 59(9-B), 5163. American Psychological Association. <a class=\"rId12\" href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/1999-95006-117\">https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/1999-95006-117<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Atlassian. 2021. \u201cUser Stories | Examples and Template.\u201d Atlassian.com. Accessed January 30, 2022.<a class=\"rId13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/agile\/project-management\/user-stories\">https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/agile\/project-management\/user-stories<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Babich, Nick. 2019. \u201cCard Sorting Best Practices for UX.\u201d Adobe. Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId14\" href=\"https:\/\/xd.adobe.com\/ideas\/process\/information-architecture\/card-sorting-best-practices\/\">https:\/\/xd.adobe.com\/ideas\/process\/information-architecture\/card-sorting-best-practices\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Bell, Steven. 2018. \u200c\u201dCourse Materials Adoption: A Faculty Survey and Outlook for the OER Landscape.\u201d <em>Choice 360. <\/em><a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.choice360.org\/research\/course-materials-adoption-a-faculty-survey-and-outlook-for-the-oer-landscape\/\">https:\/\/www.choice360.org\/research\/course-materials-adoption-a-faculty-survey-and-outlook-for-the-oer-landscape\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Bhattacherjee, Anol. 2012. <em>Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices.<\/em> Florida: University of South Florida Libraries. <a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/\">https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Blackstone, Amy. 2012. <em>Principles of Sociological Inquiry - Qualitative and Quantitative Methods<\/em>. Saylor Foundation. <a class=\"rId17\" href=\"https:\/\/open.umn.edu\/opentextbooks\/textbooks\/principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods\">https:\/\/open.umn.edu\/opentextbooks\/textbooks\/principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Colvard, Nicholas B., C. Edward Watson, and Hyojin Park. 2018. \u201cThe Impact of Open Educational Resources on Various Student Success Metrics.\u201d <em>International <\/em><em>Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education <\/em>30(2): 262\u201376. <a class=\"rId18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.isetl.org\/ijtlhe\/pdf\/IJTLHE3386.pdf\">https:\/\/www.isetl.org\/ijtlhe\/pdf\/IJTLHE3386.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Delgado, Huimei, Michael Delgado and John Hilton III. 2019. \u201cOn the Efficacy of Open Educational Resources.\u201d <em>The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning<\/em> 30(1): 184-203. <a class=\"rId19\" href=\"http:\/\/www.irrodl.org\/index.php\/irrodl\/article\/view\/3892\/4959\">http:\/\/www.irrodl.org\/index.php\/irrodl\/article\/view\/3892\/4959<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">DOERS3. 2021. \u201cOER Equity Blueprint: Theoretical Framework and Research Foundation.\u201d <a class=\"rId20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.doers3.org\/theoretical-framework-and-research-foundation.html\">https:\/\/www.doers3.org\/theoretical-framework-and-research-foundation.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Freed, Brooke, Amber Friedman, Sarah Lawlis, and Angie Stapleton. 2018. \u201cEvaluating Oregon\u2019s Open Educational Resources Designation Requirement.\u201d <a class=\"rId21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oregon.gov\/highered\/research\/Documents\/Reports\/HECC-Final-OER-Report_2018.pdf\">https:\/\/www.oregon.gov\/highered\/research\/Documents\/Reports\/HECC-Final-OER-Report_2018.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Grimaldi, Philip, Debshila Basu Mallick, Andrew Waters, and Richard Baraniuk. 2019. \u201cDo open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em>, 14(3). <a class=\"rId22\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0212508\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0212508<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Hare, Sarah, Jessica Kirschner, and Michelle Reed (Eds). 2020. <em>Marking Open and Affordable Courses: Bes<\/em><em>t Practices and Case Studies<\/em>. Arlington, TX: Mavs Open Press. <a class=\"rId23\" href=\"https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/\">https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Kwantlen Polytechnic University. 2020. \u201cKPU classes - with $0 for textbooks!\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc\">https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Maricopa Community Colleges. 2013. \u201cOpen Educational Resources.\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.maricopa.edu\/current-students\/open-educational-resources\">https:\/\/www.maricopa.edu\/current-students\/open-educational-resources<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">McGrath, Cormac, Per J. Palmgren, and Matilda Liljedahl. 2018. \u201cTwelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews.\u201d <em>Medical T<\/em><em>eacher<\/em> 41(9): 1002-1006. <a class=\"rId26\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0142159X.2018.1497149\">https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0142159X.2018.1497149<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">OECD. 2016. \u201cResearch Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research.\u201d <em>OECD Science, <\/em><em>Technology<\/em><em> and Industry Policy Papers<\/em>, 34. Paris: OECD Publishing. <a class=\"rId27\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/5jln7vnpxs32-en\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/5jln7vnpxs32-en<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cOpen Oregon Educational Resources. n.d. \u201cResources.\u201d Accessed January 20, 2022. <a class=\"rId28\" href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/\">https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Oxford Lexico. 2020. \u201cDefinition of DATA.\u201d <em>Lexico<\/em><em> Dictionaries | English<\/em>. <a class=\"rId29\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lexico.com\/en\/definition\/data\">https:\/\/www.lexico.com\/en\/definition\/data<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Seaman, Julia E., and Jeff Seaman. 2018. \u201cFreeing the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2018.\u201d Babson Survey Research Group. <a class=\"rId30\" href=\"https:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf\">https:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Seaman, Julia. and Jeff Seaman. 2017. \u201cOpening the Textbook: Educational Resources in Higher Education, 2017.\u201d Bay View Analytics. <a class=\"rId31\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bayviewanalytics.com\/reports\/openingthetextbook2017.pdf\">https:\/\/www.bayviewanalytics.com\/reports\/openingthetextbook2017.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">SPARC. 2021. \u201cOER State Policy Tracker.\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId32\" href=\"https:\/\/sparcopen.org\/our-work\/state-policy-tracking\/\">https:\/\/sparcopen.org\/our-work\/state-policy-tracking\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cUniversity System of Georgia. 2018. \u201c2018 USG Survey Report on Open Educational Resources.\u201d Affordable Learning Georgia. <a class=\"rId33\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/documents\/2018_USG_OER_Survey.pdf\">https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/documents\/2018_USG_OER_Survey.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cUniversity System of Georgia. 2021. \u201cALG Data Center.\u201d Affordable Learning Georgia. Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId34\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data\">https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2018. \u201c45 CFR 46.\u201d <a class=\"rId35\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/regulations-and-policy\/regulations\/45-cfr-46\/index.html\">https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/regulations-and-policy\/regulations\/45-cfr-46\/index.html<\/a><\/p>\n\n<\/div>","rendered":"<div class=\"chapter-21:-data-collection-and-strategies-for-oer-programs\">\n<h2>Why Collect Data?<\/h2>\n<p>When running an OER program, time can often be scarce, and a program manager may wonder why data collection needs to occupy a significant portion of this always-limited resource. Besides extrinsic motivators such as a demand for data in a report to stakeholders, data is also the peripheral nervous system of your program\u2019s organization; it is the way a program can assess successes, failures, emergent ideas, and urgent issues to address.<\/p>\n<h3>How Can Data Help?<\/h3>\n<p>Data collection, analysis, and reporting can yield multiple benefits for your OER program. Data can guide strategic decision-making when a program wants to adjust, adapt, and move forward. A report based on collected and analyzed data can help tell the story of why your program has the potential to, or already is, making a difference in your institution or system. Data can also indicate a need for targeted open education programming and funding, such as data on high textbook costs, students\u2019 financial needs, or faculty awareness of OER.<\/p>\n<h2>Data Collection and Ethics<\/h2>\n<p>Before collecting data, be sure to keep some basic ethical guidelines in mind:<\/p>\n<h3>Privacy<\/h3>\n<p>Data privacy may be a priority at your institution already, given the potential for cybercrime and the existence of legal requirements for data privacy, such as the Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA) in the United States. Alongside these, be sure that you have a reason to collect and\/or report any personal identifiable information (PII) before doing so. For example, if an awarded grant proposal requires an institutional email address (which is likely already displayed on their campus website), this is likely enough contact information; including a phone number or a physical address may not be necessary.<\/p>\n<h3>Consent<\/h3>\n<p>Anyone who is submitting data to you, or getting data collected passively via web or platform analytics, should know who this data will be submitted to and why it\u2019s being collected. When someone has informed consent in submitting data to you, not only do they acknowledge that their data is being collected, but they know your intent in collecting and using this data. Transparency in your data needs pre-collection and your reporting post-collection will help.<\/p>\n<h3>Anonymity<\/h3>\n<p>Alongside data privacy, be sure to anonymize, or \u201cde-identify,\u201d the data you collect whenever necessary. For example, in the United States, institutions often meet FERPA guidelines in collecting student data by replacing PII with an anonymized identifier with no meaning to anyone except the data collectors and analyzers (OECD 2016).<\/p>\n<h3>Equity<\/h3>\n<p>Equity is often an implicit goal in OER programs; any program that attempts to close the gap in educational materials costs and barriers to access is essentially addressing educational equity (DOERS3 2021). Therefore, be sure to collect, analyze, and report your data through the lens of educational equity; if you can analyze how the implementation of OER affects marginalized demographic groups at your institution, that analysis will help your initiative tell a more focused and comprehensive story of how your program works. See the Disaggregating Your Data section later in the chapter for more details.<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">Data Collection and Institutional Review Boards (IRB)<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>Institutional Review Boards are essential for ensuring that research taking place complies with both legal and institutional guidelines. In the United States, institutional review boards are built into federal regulations and ensure protections for all human research subjects. In the United States regulations, educational research on the effectiveness of instructional strategies, curriculum changes, and classroom management methods are typically exempt, so long as the research does not impact students\u2019 ability to learn and instructors\u2019 ability to teach (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 2018).<\/p>\n<p>Surveys, interviews, and focus groups can be exempt, but the more easily identifiable the subjects are on a personal level, the more likely that this research will not be exempt. Keeping privacy, consent, and anonymity in mind will help with this, as will awareness and transparency of any third parties that may be responsible for the collection and\/or protection of your data.<\/p>\n<p>This will likely cover most open education research, but it is still good to do due diligence with your IRB; there may be an outstanding issue with a particular study or further institutional guidelines which need to be met. Once you have a plan for a research study or a large data collection effort, contact your IRB for your institution\u2019s own details and guidelines.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>An OER Data Workflow, From Strategy to Collection<\/h2>\n<p>When you are starting your OER program\u2019s data collection, don\u2019t start at the collecting part: instead, start with figuring out exactly why you need data and how you\u2019ll use it once it\u2019s collected. Then, move to the <em>what<\/em> with actual data collection. To model this process, this chapter will work in chronological order and discuss data collection at the <em>end<\/em> of the chapter. You may encounter some data-specific terminology in the examples that you\u2019re unsure of at first, and this is okay; data terminology is discussed in the Data Collection section at the end.<\/p>\n<h3>Step 1: Creating a Critical Questions List<\/h3>\n<p>Because the needs of your stakeholders should drive your decision-making in an OER program, start with these needs when determining what type of data you want to collect. You can do this by looking at each stakeholder group for the program and determining a list of critical questions that your key stakeholders will ask, therefore determining a need to collect the necessary data to answer these questions (see Step 3).<\/p>\n<p>Please note that you first need to <em>know<\/em> your stakeholders and their environments. See <a href=\"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/chapter\/chapter-8-building-familiarity-on-campus\/\">Chapter 8, Building Familiarity on Campus<\/a>, for ways to familiarize yourself with the needs of diverse stakeholders at your institution. This familiarity will also help you know how to obtain data from different departments or offices at your institution, and possibly how easy or difficult that process will be.<\/p>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Executive Administration<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>How much in textbook cost avoidance have you saved students over the past academic year?<\/li>\n<li>How many students has this program affected?<\/li>\n<li>What are the savings numbers for last semester?<\/li>\n<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student retention at a course level? A degree program level?<\/li>\n<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this effect larger for first-generation students?<\/li>\n<li>How long should we expect savings to continue due to one award? Do faculty turn to commercial resources after a certain period of time? Why do they, if so?<\/li>\n<li>How do faculty feel about OER? Does that differ by department or if they\u2019re teaching introductory \/ advanced courses?<\/li>\n<li>Do students think that the cost of materials is an important thing for our institution to address?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Instructional Faculty (Instructors, Instructional Designers)<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this a same-instructor comparison, or an aggregate of all instructors?<\/li>\n<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success in the College of Arts and Sciences?<\/li>\n<li>Has the implementation of OER affected student success in our IT degree programs?<\/li>\n<li>For all the OER used in the Biology department, which textbook is used most for Concepts of Biology?<\/li>\n<li>How do students feel about the OER materials they\u2019ve used?<\/li>\n<li>Do enough of us know about OER to get started with implementation? How do faculty feel about OER once they get to know it?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Students and Student Government Associations<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>We are looking to support the implementation of OER campus-wide. Which faculty already are adopting OER?<\/li>\n<li>If all of our World History I sections had no-cost OER instead of commercial textbooks, how much would this save students over the next academic year?<\/li>\n<li>Is a student who takes an OER course in Electrical Engineering at our technical college more or less likely to be hired directly after graduation?<\/li>\n<li>What\u2019s keeping our faculty from adopting OER? How can we help with any barriers they\u2019re facing?<\/li>\n<li>How do students feel about OER once they\u2019ve used it?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Stakeholder Example: Campus Stores<\/h4>\n<ul>\n<li>What percentage of students on campus are interested in a print-on-demand program for OER?<\/li>\n<li>Do bookstore employees know about OER? What do they think about it?<\/li>\n<li>What do students think about our new low-cost mathematics platform?<\/li>\n<li>How are students performing due to our new low-cost psychology adaptive platform?<\/li>\n<li>If we do a print service for open textbooks, what percentage of students in the course would want a printed textbook?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h3>Step 2: Exploring Data Types<\/h3>\n<p>Once you have a comprehensive list of critical questions, turn these lists into tables with a column for the data you need to collect. The table can set the standards for how and when you collect various data for each project within your OER program, along with partnerships that need to be made to gather data outside of your direct access and\/or control.<\/p>\n<p>Because data collection may be a new practice to a first-time OER program manager, we will first discuss some basic data methodologies and ways to gather useful, analyzable OER-related data at your institution or system.<\/p>\n<h4>Quantitative Methods: Getting Impactful Numerical Data<\/h4>\n<p>Quantitative methods of data collection result in data that can be represented by and condensed into numbers (Blackstone 2012). Quantitative data may have a reputation for being a less human way of looking at a program, as it\u2019s often seen as the \u201chard\u201d or \u201cobjective\u201d kind used exclusively on impact or accountability reports. This isn\u2019t the whole story for OER program managers; quantitative data can find the magnitude of the effect of particular OER programs or projects, the most pressing needs of an institution or a department when selecting course materials, or how different introductory courses at your institution have adopted OER at different rates.<\/p>\n<p>OER programs are, by default, focused on educational equity, and these programs can be sidetracked by the perceived \u201cobjectivity\u201d of quantitative data. All quantitative data, including OER program data, will have its flaws, and too much reliance on quantitative data may steer a program into the illusion of pure objectivity (Armor 1998). Be sure to take into account how power, privilege, and inequity could interact and intersect with your data and how you analyze it. Qualitative data can also help with this, as discussed in the next section.<\/p>\n<h5>Quantitative Surveying<\/h5>\n<p>A form with answers which can be quantified is sent to instructors, staff, and\/or students. Quantitative response formats include numerical responses, multiple choice responses, rating scales, and rankings.<\/p>\n<p>Examples of quantitative survey data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Percentage of higher education faculty who are aware of OER (Seaman 2018, p.11)\n<ul>\n<li>Keep in mind: How aware is \u201caware\u201d when it\u2019s self-reported? Are you asking this question and defining terminology first? Do faculty know that awareness goes beyond knowing these definitions?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Ranking of the most serious barriers to adopting OER (Seaman 2017, p.30)\n<ul>\n<li>Keep in mind: If you have a \u201cquality\u201d item ranked in here, how do faculty define what quality is? Open-ended qualitative responses will help here.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>Web Analytics<\/h5>\n<p>If you have a website for your initiative that offers impactful opportunities like professional development, grant applications, or OER discovery assistance, analytics can help you understand where your stakeholders are visiting, what they are prioritizing, and how long they are spending on the site. Analytics may also be available from third-parties in your web-based OER repositories and textbook platforms. Be sure to take privacy into account when addressing analytics: are you (or third-parties) over-collecting what you need?<\/p>\n<p>Examples of web analytics data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Number of unique users visiting a web page per time period (day, week, month, etc.)\n<ul>\n<li>Keep in mind: These are often anonymized, but they\u2019re based on unique internet protocol (IP) addresses. Are these IP addresses deleted, or are they stored somewhere? This could be personal identifiable information (PII) that would need to be protected.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Top regions\/countries with OER downloads or views in a repository\n<ul>\n<li>Keep in mind: Are these places more likely to use your OER because they have English as a first or second language? What would happen if you offered translations?<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<li>Most-downloaded open resources in a repository\n<ul>\n<li>Keep in mind: This may be because of one gigantic supersection adoption, or it may be many individuals downloading a particular resource from all walks of life. It\u2019s possible that due to protecting PII, you may never know the difference. An adoption survey can help, but it\u2019s tough to get a high response rate on those surveys<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>No-Cost and Low-Cost Designators in Course Schedules<\/h5>\n<p>OER program managers have been considering the implementation of no-cost and low-cost course materials designators in student registration systems since 2013, when Maricopa Community College\u2019s Maricopa Millions program implemented its OER designator and shared this practice with the larger community (Maricopa Community College 2013). Multiple states have now mandated no-cost, low-cost, and\/or OER designators, and both individual institutions and university systems have moved these programs forward in recent years (SPARC 2021). There are many factors to keep in mind when using designator data: see the Further Reading section in this chapter for a comprehensive resource on designators to assist with this.<\/p>\n<p>Examples of no-cost and low-cost course materials designator data include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Percentage of sections with no-cost course materials designators in a course<\/li>\n<li>Number of student course enrollments affected by no-cost and low-cost course materials designators<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h4>Qualitative Methods: Getting Meaningful Perspectives and Experiences<\/h4>\n<p>Qualitative data has a reputation for being the \u201csoft\u201d or subjective data that, at first glance, may appear to not be as helpful in determining the impact of your program or informing future decisions. As an OER program manager, it\u2019s a great idea to throw this reputation out entirely: qualitative data collection is extremely helpful in illustrating the meaning behind quantitative data, understanding the overall emotions and opinions surrounding various goals and projects within your program, and identifying emerging trends which your more deterministic quantitative questions could not have anticipated.<\/p>\n<p>Qualitative data can be intimidating, as extra time and skills are required to manage and analyze open-ended qualitative data. Still, the outcomes of this extra time and effort can impact the quality and sustainability of your program heavily, and getting to know qualitative data is highly recommended.<\/p>\n<h5>Qualitative Surveying<\/h5>\n<p>Often within the same form as quantitative questions, qualitative survey questions demand answers which can be categorized and interpreted at a semantic level. Qualitative responses in surveys are typically open-ended short responses and open-ended paragraph\/essay responses, along with the \u201cOther\u201d text box option for quantitative multiple-choice questions.<\/p>\n<p>Examples of qualitative survey data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Quotes which are illustrative of corresponding quantitative OER findings (Bell 2018, p.14)<\/li>\n<li>Emerging trends and issues in OER which quantitative survey questions did not anticipate (Gallant 2018, p.25)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h5>Interviews and Focus Groups<\/h5>\n<p>Interviews and focus groups are in-depth, largely qualitative data collection methods which normally involve a conversation with someone, or a group of people, in order to dive deeper into a particular topic than quantitative research can usually cover (Bhattacherjee 2012). One salient benefit of these methods is that trends and potential issues often emerge naturally from these conversations.<\/p>\n<p>Unlike surveys, interviewing and running focus groups require building a rapport with participants, listening actively, handling emotions during conversations, and managing issues of inclusion, such as the hidden cultural and power dimensions of a conversation (McGrath 2018). Having more than one researcher working on the project can help keep interview and focus group analyses from skewing in the direction of one researcher\u2019s line of thinking. Focus groups may also include more methodical activities to start a focused conversation, such as card sorting for usability and user experience topics (Babich 2019).<\/p>\n<p>As one person or group cannot reliably represent an entire group of people, more than one interview or focus group is often planned when gathering data about the efficacy of an OER program. Examples of interview data gathered and analyzed for OER programs include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Emergent ideas from students on the usability of an OER text or platform (Cooney 2017, p.169)<\/li>\n<li>Emergent issues regarding registration deadlines and faculty textbook adoptions from groups of students (Freed, Friedman, Lawlis, and Stanton 2018)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--exercises\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">OER Data Examples<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>The following table includes some examples of key impact indicators, data kept for analysis and calculations, data that disaggregates other data into various groups, methods used by grantees or overall instructional faculty, and perceptions of various course material-related topics by overall instructional faculty. Please feel free to add to, remove, or revise this data list for your own program\u2019s needs and contexts.<\/p>\n<p><a class=\"rId5\" href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/spreadsheets\/d\/1ApnAYD2LlcnOFGn-3Fsd1YGNoByVdRDk11LAGgBkDDI\/edit\">OER Data List Spreadsheet<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--examples\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">Disaggregating Your Data to Address Equity Directly<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<p>A focus on equal, day-one, no-cost access to resources is inherently a focus on equity; equity should be within an OER program manager\u2019s mode of thinking at all times, and therefore measures focusing on equity should be integral to every OER program\u2019s overall goals and strategies. When addressing student success with OER, measuring only the total aggregate data for all students can be a quick way to gauge overall effectiveness, but it is not a way to find out if equal access to quality resources is leading to more success specifically for students with barriers to that access. In fact, only looking at the data of all students affected by an OER course transformation will likely lead to an analysis that isn\u2019t measuring your intended equity-focused outcomes (Grimaldi, Mallick, and Waters 2019).<\/p>\n<p>To bring equity into your data collection strategy, plan to collect disaggregated data (data categorized by various groups) from your institution which reflects various equity groups being addressed primarily in an equity-focused program: those with barriers to educational materials access and those for whom traditional materials tend to exclude. Examples of disaggregated-data studies on OER efficacy include a same-instructor, multi-year analysis which breaks down efficacy results by Pell eligibility, race\/ethnicity, and enrollment status, which found disproportionate effects for marginalized groups (Colvard, Watson, and Park 2018) and a two-semester study of a calculus course with and without OER in 2014, which found no effect for all students but positive effects for marginalized groups (Delgado, Delgado, and Hilton 2019)<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Demographic groups that should be considered in OER data disaggregation include but are not limited to (DOERS 2021):<\/li>\n<li>Socioeconomic status of the student or student\u2019s family (Pell Grant eligibility)<\/li>\n<li>Race\/ethnicity of the student<\/li>\n<li>Gender of the student, including self-reported gender identities<\/li>\n<li>Indigenous status, if applicable in your region<\/li>\n<li>First-generation status<\/li>\n<li>Enrollment status and teaching\/learning modalities (part-time, full-time \/ in-person, online, hybrid)<\/li>\n<li>Accessibility needs \/ students with varied abilities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h3>Step 3: Assigning Specific Data Collection to Your Critical Questions<\/h3>\n<p>Now that you have your critical questions from stakeholders across your institution and a working knowledge of the fundamentals of OER data collection, it\u2019s time to plan your actions. By assigning the types of data required by your stakeholders to answer their questions, you\u2019ll have a framework for exactly what you need to collect, along with the stakeholders for which the reports on this data will be intended.<\/p>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 262px;width: 100%\">\n<caption>Table 21.1. Stakeholder Example: Executive Administration<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 15px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 15px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How much in textbook cost avoidance have you saved students over the past academic year?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Student OER\/zero-cost section enrollments affected this academic year, cost savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 15px\">How many students has this program affected?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 15px\">Section enrollments affected cumulatively at the semester level<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">What are the savings numbers for last semester?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Section enrollments affected at the semester level, cost savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student retention at a course level? A degree program level?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Institution\u2019s preferred method of measuring student retention per each OER section, e.g. Drop\/Fail\/Withdraw or D\/F\/Withdraw (DFW) rates<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this effect larger for first-generation students?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per student affected, disaggregation of data by demographic groups<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How long should we expect savings to continue due to one award? Do faculty turn to commercial resources after a certain period of time? Why do they, if so?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Checks on sustainability of an OER implementation for each instructor and each course\/section, survey responses if OER use is discontinued<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">How do faculty feel about OER? Does that differ by department or if they\u2019re teaching introductory \/ advanced courses?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with instructional faculty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"width: 498.719px;height: 31px\">Do students think that the cost of materials is an important thing for our institution to address?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 481.391px;height: 31px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 185px;width: 100%\">\n<caption>Table 21.2. Stakeholder Example: Instructional Faculty (Instructors, Instructional Designers)<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 449.383px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 531.75px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success? Is this a same-instructor comparison, or an aggregate of all instructors?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">Grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section, disaggregation of data by instructor of course before and after OER implementation<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success in the College of Arts and Sciences?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per college, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Has the implementation of OER affected student success in our IT degree programs?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per degree program, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">For all the OER used in the Biology department, which textbook is used most for Concepts of Biology?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">OER sections per department, open textbook(s) or other OER adopted per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 449.383px\">How do students feel about the OER materials they\u2019ve used?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 531.75px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 449.383px\">Do enough of us know about OER to get started with implementation? How do faculty feel about OER once they get to know it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 531.75px\">Qualitative and quantitative data on the participation in \/ impact of professional development programming on OER at the institution<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"width: 100%\">\n<caption>Table 21.3. Stakeholder Example: Students and Student Government Associations<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th style=\"width: 448.047px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"width: 525.078px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">We are looking to support the implementation of OER campus-wide. Which faculty already are adopting OER?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Instructional faculty in each OER section, colleges\/departments\/degree programs per section<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">If all of our World History I sections had no-cost OER instead of commercial textbooks, how much would this save students over the next academic year?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Annual OER projections, projected number of enrollments in next AY, average savings per student per course<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">Is a student who takes an OER course in Electrical Engineering at our technical college more or less likely to be hired directly after graduation?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">OER section enrollment per student per degree program, hiring data per student<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">What\u2019s keeping our faculty from adopting OER? How can we help with any barriers they\u2019re facing?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with instructional faculty<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"width: 448.047px\">How do students feel about OER once they\u2019ve used it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"width: 525.078px\">Course evaluations, surveys<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<table class=\"grid\" style=\"height: 154px;width: 100%\">\n<caption>Table 21.4. Stakeholder Example: Campus Stores<\/caption>\n<thead>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.078px\" scope=\"col\">Critical Question<\/th>\n<th style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.047px\" scope=\"col\">Data Required<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 465.578px\">What percentage of students on campus are interested in a print-on-demand program for OER?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.578px\">Do bookstore employees know about OER? What do they think about it?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 15px\">\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 465.578px\">What do students think about our new low-cost mathematics platform?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 15px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 31px\">\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 465.578px\">How are students performing due to our new low-cost psychology adaptive platform?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 31px;width: 515.547px\">Platforms adopted per section, grades and\/or learning outcomes\/competencies data per section, same-instructor comparisons before and after<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr style=\"height: 47px\">\n<td style=\"height: 47px;width: 465.578px\">If we do a print service for open textbooks, what\u2019s the average percentage of students in the course who would want a printed textbook?<\/td>\n<td style=\"height: 47px;width: 515.547px\">Qualitative data from surveys, focus groups, and\/or interviews with students<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<h3>Step 4: Creating a Place for Your Data Collection<\/h3>\n<p>Now that you have identified which data you need to collect based on stakeholder needs, categorized and defined each type of data, and determined the methods for data collection for each, it\u2019s time to create one place where all of this data resides. Whenever possible, keep this data together in one file; questions will inevitably arise which will require you to bring data points together that may have seemed entirely disconnected at first.<\/p>\n<p>There is no one correct method or platform to host your data. When considering where this place for your data will reside, consider the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Which methods are you most familiar with?<\/li>\n<li>Which methods allow you to sort by any data point easily?<\/li>\n<li>Which methods allow a quick search of your data?<\/li>\n<li>Which methods can manage multiple years of data? Does the system get overloaded when you have too many columns or rows?<\/li>\n<li>Will you keep any data considered personally identifiable information? In this case, which methods allow for you to comply with all FERPA guidelines and manage personal data ethically? What should you <em>not <\/em>share with the public due to privacy?<\/li>\n<li>If some data needs to be protected (e.g. in the event of gathering PII), how secure are the methods and platforms from cyberattacks?<\/li>\n<li>Which methods allow for accessible data visualization? This will allow you to make your data more usable and readable to stakeholders.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Here are a few examples of places for OER data. All of these examples have internal data storage tools that are linked directly to their external reporting structures:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li><a class=\"rId6\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data\">Affordable Learning Georgia<\/a> uses Microsoft Excel for one large ALG Tracking sheet. This sheet is hosted in a shared drive and able to be edited by anyone in ALG. Microsoft Power BI links with Excel to create data visualizations and export to PDF for institution-specific reports.<\/li>\n<li><a class=\"rId7\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc\">Kwantlen Polytechnic University<\/a> visualizes their live Zero Textbook Cost program data through Tableau.<\/li>\n<li><a class=\"rId8\" href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/\">Open Oregon Educational Resources<\/a> stores their data in a Google Sheet and visualizes this data in a searchable web table.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>By this point in the planning process, you should have a solid data strategy and plan in place for your OER program. This plan should evolve over time as stakeholder needs and data platform capabilities change and\/or expand.<\/p>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Data collection allows an OER program manager to analyze program activities, determine the impact of projects, and report on this impact to governments, executive administrators, faculty and staff, students, and the public. Determining how you will measure the impact of your OER program early in the building process is a crucial part of creating and sustaining a successful program. Be sure to refer to your Environmental Scan (see Building Familiarity on Campus) in determining who, other than you and your team, collects and shares this helpful data.<\/p>\n<h2>Recommended Resources<\/h2>\n<p><a class=\"rId9\" href=\"https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/\">Marking Open and Affordable Courses<\/a> (Hare, Kirschner, and Reed 2020), an open text published by the University of Texas at Arlington, is a comprehensive guide to no-cost and low-cost designators, containing analyses of the policy and practices behind OER\/affordable course markings and nine case studies from diverse higher education institutions and systems.<\/p>\n<p>Getting to know the basics of quantitative and qualitative research is an essential task for new OER program managers. <a class=\"rId10\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/\">Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices<\/a> (Bhattacherjee 2012) is an open textbook that dives into the theories behind both quantitative and qualitative research; be sure to check out the full chapter on qualitative analysis (p.113).<\/p>\n<p>This text only addresses the collection of data as immediately relevant to OER Program Managers. For a more in-depth look at OER research methods (for example, as meant to be published within a peer-reviewed journal), please read the <a class=\"rId11\" href=\"http:\/\/openedgroup.org\/toolkit\">OER Research Toolkit <\/a>(Open Education Group 2016).<\/p>\n<div class=\"textbox textbox--key-takeaways\">\n<header class=\"textbox__header\">Key Takeaways<\/header>\n<div class=\"textbox__content\">\n<ol>\n<li>Use quantitative data to find the magnitude of the effect of particular OER programs or projects, the needs of your institution and its departments when selecting course materials, or how different introductory courses at your institution have adopted OER at different rates.<\/li>\n<li>Use qualitative data to illustrate the meaning behind quantitative data, gain an understanding of the overall emotions and opinions surrounding various goals and projects within your program, and identify emerging trends which your more deterministic quantitative questions could not have anticipated.<\/li>\n<li>OER programs are inherently focused on equity. Planning on collecting disaggregated data by groups with barriers to quality educational resource access will help measure the effect your program has on the students who need it most.<\/li>\n<li>Reporting data will be largely based on what your key stakeholders want to know. Use information from your environmental scan to further plan the data you will collect.<\/li>\n<li>Stakeholder needs and the capabilities of platforms to keep and analyze data will change over time at your institution. Be sure that your plan evolves alongside these changes.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<h2>References<\/h2>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Armor, David Alain. 1998. \u201cThe illusion of objectivity: A bias in the perception of freedom from bias.\u201d <em>Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering<\/em>, 59(9-B), 5163. American Psychological Association. <a class=\"rId12\" href=\"https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/1999-95006-117\">https:\/\/psycnet.apa.org\/record\/1999-95006-117<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Atlassian. 2021. \u201cUser Stories | Examples and Template.\u201d Atlassian.com. Accessed January 30, 2022.<a class=\"rId13\" href=\"https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/agile\/project-management\/user-stories\">https:\/\/www.atlassian.com\/agile\/project-management\/user-stories<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Babich, Nick. 2019. \u201cCard Sorting Best Practices for UX.\u201d Adobe. Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId14\" href=\"https:\/\/xd.adobe.com\/ideas\/process\/information-architecture\/card-sorting-best-practices\/\">https:\/\/xd.adobe.com\/ideas\/process\/information-architecture\/card-sorting-best-practices\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Bell, Steven. 2018. \u200c\u201dCourse Materials Adoption: A Faculty Survey and Outlook for the OER Landscape.\u201d <em>Choice 360. <\/em><a class=\"rId15\" href=\"https:\/\/www.choice360.org\/research\/course-materials-adoption-a-faculty-survey-and-outlook-for-the-oer-landscape\/\">https:\/\/www.choice360.org\/research\/course-materials-adoption-a-faculty-survey-and-outlook-for-the-oer-landscape\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Bhattacherjee, Anol. 2012. <em>Social Science Research: Principles, Methods, and Practices.<\/em> Florida: University of South Florida Libraries. <a class=\"rId16\" href=\"https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/\">https:\/\/digitalcommons.usf.edu\/oa_textbooks\/3\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Blackstone, Amy. 2012. <em>Principles of Sociological Inquiry &#8211; Qualitative and Quantitative Methods<\/em>. Saylor Foundation. <a class=\"rId17\" href=\"https:\/\/open.umn.edu\/opentextbooks\/textbooks\/principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods\">https:\/\/open.umn.edu\/opentextbooks\/textbooks\/principles-of-sociological-inquiry-qualitative-and-quantitative-methods<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Colvard, Nicholas B., C. Edward Watson, and Hyojin Park. 2018. \u201cThe Impact of Open Educational Resources on Various Student Success Metrics.\u201d <em>International <\/em><em>Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education <\/em>30(2): 262\u201376. <a class=\"rId18\" href=\"https:\/\/www.isetl.org\/ijtlhe\/pdf\/IJTLHE3386.pdf\">https:\/\/www.isetl.org\/ijtlhe\/pdf\/IJTLHE3386.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Delgado, Huimei, Michael Delgado and John Hilton III. 2019. \u201cOn the Efficacy of Open Educational Resources.\u201d <em>The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning<\/em> 30(1): 184-203. <a class=\"rId19\" href=\"http:\/\/www.irrodl.org\/index.php\/irrodl\/article\/view\/3892\/4959\">http:\/\/www.irrodl.org\/index.php\/irrodl\/article\/view\/3892\/4959<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">DOERS3. 2021. \u201cOER Equity Blueprint: Theoretical Framework and Research Foundation.\u201d <a class=\"rId20\" href=\"https:\/\/www.doers3.org\/theoretical-framework-and-research-foundation.html\">https:\/\/www.doers3.org\/theoretical-framework-and-research-foundation.html<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Freed, Brooke, Amber Friedman, Sarah Lawlis, and Angie Stapleton. 2018. \u201cEvaluating Oregon\u2019s Open Educational Resources Designation Requirement.\u201d <a class=\"rId21\" href=\"https:\/\/www.oregon.gov\/highered\/research\/Documents\/Reports\/HECC-Final-OER-Report_2018.pdf\">https:\/\/www.oregon.gov\/highered\/research\/Documents\/Reports\/HECC-Final-OER-Report_2018.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Grimaldi, Philip, Debshila Basu Mallick, Andrew Waters, and Richard Baraniuk. 2019. \u201cDo open educational resources improve student learning? Implications of the access hypothesis.\u201d <em>PLOS ONE<\/em>, 14(3). <a class=\"rId22\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0212508\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pone.0212508<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Hare, Sarah, Jessica Kirschner, and Michelle Reed (Eds). 2020. <em>Marking Open and Affordable Courses: Bes<\/em><em>t Practices and Case Studies<\/em>. Arlington, TX: Mavs Open Press. <a class=\"rId23\" href=\"https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/\">https:\/\/uta.pressbooks.pub\/markingopenandaffordablecourses\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Kwantlen Polytechnic University. 2020. \u201cKPU classes &#8211; with $0 for textbooks!\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId24\" href=\"https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc\">https:\/\/www.kpu.ca\/open\/ztc<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Maricopa Community Colleges. 2013. \u201cOpen Educational Resources.\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId25\" href=\"https:\/\/www.maricopa.edu\/current-students\/open-educational-resources\">https:\/\/www.maricopa.edu\/current-students\/open-educational-resources<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">McGrath, Cormac, Per J. Palmgren, and Matilda Liljedahl. 2018. \u201cTwelve tips for conducting qualitative research interviews.\u201d <em>Medical T<\/em><em>eacher<\/em> 41(9): 1002-1006. <a class=\"rId26\" href=\"https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0142159X.2018.1497149\">https:\/\/www.tandfonline.com\/doi\/full\/10.1080\/0142159X.2018.1497149<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">OECD. 2016. \u201cResearch Ethics and New Forms of Data for Social and Economic Research.\u201d <em>OECD Science, <\/em><em>Technology<\/em><em> and Industry Policy Papers<\/em>, 34. Paris: OECD Publishing. <a class=\"rId27\" href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/5jln7vnpxs32-en\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1787\/5jln7vnpxs32-en<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cOpen Oregon Educational Resources. n.d. \u201cResources.\u201d Accessed January 20, 2022. <a class=\"rId28\" href=\"https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/\">https:\/\/openoregon.org\/resources\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Oxford Lexico. 2020. \u201cDefinition of DATA.\u201d <em>Lexico<\/em><em> Dictionaries | English<\/em>. <a class=\"rId29\" href=\"https:\/\/www.lexico.com\/en\/definition\/data\">https:\/\/www.lexico.com\/en\/definition\/data<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Seaman, Julia E., and Jeff Seaman. 2018. \u201cFreeing the Textbook: Educational Resources in U.S. Higher Education, 2018.\u201d Babson Survey Research Group. <a class=\"rId30\" href=\"https:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf\">https:\/\/www.onlinelearningsurvey.com\/reports\/freeingthetextbook2018.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">Seaman, Julia. and Jeff Seaman. 2017. \u201cOpening the Textbook: Educational Resources in Higher Education, 2017.\u201d Bay View Analytics. <a class=\"rId31\" href=\"https:\/\/www.bayviewanalytics.com\/reports\/openingthetextbook2017.pdf\">https:\/\/www.bayviewanalytics.com\/reports\/openingthetextbook2017.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">SPARC. 2021. \u201cOER State Policy Tracker.\u201d Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId32\" href=\"https:\/\/sparcopen.org\/our-work\/state-policy-tracking\/\">https:\/\/sparcopen.org\/our-work\/state-policy-tracking\/<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cUniversity System of Georgia. 2018. \u201c2018 USG Survey Report on Open Educational Resources.\u201d Affordable Learning Georgia. <a class=\"rId33\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/documents\/2018_USG_OER_Survey.pdf\">https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/documents\/2018_USG_OER_Survey.pdf<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">\u200cUniversity System of Georgia. 2021. \u201cALG Data Center.\u201d Affordable Learning Georgia. Accessed January 30, 2022. <a class=\"rId34\" href=\"https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data\">https:\/\/www.affordablelearninggeorgia.org\/about\/data<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: left\">U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2018. \u201c45 CFR 46.\u201d <a class=\"rId35\" href=\"https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/regulations-and-policy\/regulations\/45-cfr-46\/index.html\">https:\/\/www.hhs.gov\/ohrp\/regulations-and-policy\/regulations\/45-cfr-46\/index.html<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"menu_order":1,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":["jeff"],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[68],"license":[],"class_list":["post-118","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","contributor-jeff"],"part":117,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/118","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/118\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":119,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/118\/revisions\/119"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/117"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/118\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=118"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=118"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/integrations.pressbooks.network\/oerstarterkit\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=118"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}